Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Surface characterization and clinical review of two commercially available implants
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7488-3588
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Applied Surface Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus, OH, United States; Department of Prosthodontics, West Virginia University, School of Dentistry, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Implant Dentistry, ISSN 1056-6163, E-ISSN 1538-2982, Vol. 22, no 5, p. 507-518Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To characterize topographically and chemically the surfaces of 2 commercially available implants. Furthermore, to gather an overview of the clinical results of these implant systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two commercially available oral implants were analyzed using optical interferometry, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive spectroscopy. In addition, a literature search for all the clinical articles on the same implants was performed. RESULTS: No significant differences of topographical parameters were found between the 2 implants, except for the hybrid parameter Sdr presenting significant higher values for the Ankylos implants. Both surfaces had a homogenous microporosity. At higher magnifications of scanning electron microscope images, evenly distributed nanostructures (approximately 10 nm) were visible. Chemically, mainly titanium, oxygen and carbon were detected. Fifty-six clinical articles were included for the review. The implant survival rates (minimum follow-up: 5 years) ranged between 87.7% and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The examined commercially available implants showed a moderately rough surface, with a homogenous microporosity. Nanofeatures were detected on the surface of both implants. The clinical performances of these implants were comparable to that of other commercialized implant systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lamy, Wolters Kluwer, 2013. Vol. 22, no 5, p. 507-518
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15849DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318294308fISI: 000325099000015PubMedID: 23823733Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84885176223Local ID: 16400OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15849DiVA, id: diva2:1419371
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Galli, SilviaJimbo, RyoAlbrektsson, Tomas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Galli, SilviaJimbo, RyoAlbrektsson, Tomas
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Implant Dentistry
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf