Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Recurrence probability for keratocystic odontogenic tumors: An analysis of 6,427 cases
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3460-3374
2017 (English)In: Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN 1010-5182, E-ISSN 1878-4119, Vol. 45, no 2, p. 244-251Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Purpose. To investigate and compare the probability of recurrence of keratocystic odontogenic tumors (KCOTs) for different variables and treatment protocols. Materials and Methods. An electronic search was undertaken in April 2016 that included clinical series of KCOTs reporting recurrences. Untransformed proportions and meta-analyses were performed to estimate the probability/risk of recurrence, according to several variables. Results. A total of 94 publications were included (6,427 KCOTs, 1,464 recurrences). Probability of recurrence: all lesions, 21.1%; nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, 35.4%; males, 20.3%; females, 19.3%; maxilla, 15.3%; mandible, 21.5%; unilocular, 14.7%; multilocular, 24.4%; marsupialization/decompression, 28.7%; decompression+enucleation±additional therapy, 18.6%; enucleation/curettage, 22.5%; enucleation+peripheral ostectomy, 18.6%; enucleation+Carnoy’s solution, 5.3%; enucleation+cryotherapy, 20.9%; marginal/segmental resection, 2.2%. The recurrence was not statistically significantly affected by lesion location (maxilla vs. mandible, risk ratio [RR] 0.92, P=0.32) or patient’s sex (male vs. female, RR 0.94,P=0.44), but by locularity (unilocular vs. multilocular, RR 0.67, P=0.007). Recurrence risk for surgical managements: marsupialization vs. enucleation (RR 1.65,P=0.0006), marsupialization vs. resection (RR 3.17, P=0.009), enucleation alone vs. enucleation+peripheral ostectomy (RR 1.66, P=0.05), enucleation alone vs. enucleation+Carnoy’s solution (RR 1.94, P=0.03), enucleation alone vs. enucleation+cryotherapy (RR 0.88, P=0.56). Conclusions. KCOTs have a considerable rate of recurrence, which varies significantly according to some clinical, radiographic, and histopathological features, as well as surgical management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 45, no 2, p. 244-251
Keywords [en]
Keratocystic odontogenic tumor, Marsupialization, Enucleation, Resection, Outcome, Meta-analysis
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15675DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.010ISI: 000394919400012Local ID: 21685OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15675DiVA, id: diva2:1419197
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2022-06-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Chrcanovic, Bruno

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chrcanovic, Bruno
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf