Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does crown/implant ratio influence the survival and marginal bone level of short single implants in the mandibular molar?: A preliminary investigation consisting of 12 patients
Department of Oral Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Oral Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Oral Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of dentistry, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza Governorate, Giza, Egypt.
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7488-3588
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, E-ISSN 1365-2842, Vol. 43, no 2, p. 127-135Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Crown/implant (C/I) ratio has been proven to not affect the survival of the implants; however, it is also a fact that no evidence exists with regard to the use of single short implants in the mandibular molar. The aim of this study was to determine whether the crown/implant ratios of single implant-supported fixed restorations on implants of 6-8 mm in the mandibular molar have an impact on the implant survival and marginal bone maintenance. Twelve short dental implants (6-8 mm) were installed and restored with single crowns, loaded after 3 months of healing. The restorations were divided according to crown-to-implant ratio into two groups: Group 1: C/I < 2.0 and Group 2: C/I >== 2.0. Alveolar bone loss was measured using CBCT scan, taken at the implant placement and after 12 months follow-up from loading. Reduced implant/crown ratio shown no statistic significant differences on implant survival and the alveolar bone level compared with recommended implant/crown ratio. Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that reduced C/I ratio could be used as a substitute for recommended C/I ratio in severely mandibular atrophic residual alveolar ridges.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2016. Vol. 43, no 2, p. 127-135
Keywords [en]
dental implants, single tooth, mandible, prostheses and implants, bone resorption, treatment outcome
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15556DOI: 10.1111/joor.12342ISI: 000368019700007PubMedID: 26333185Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84954398201Local ID: 19992OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15556DiVA, id: diva2:1419078
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Galli, SilviaJimbo, Ryo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Galli, SilviaJimbo, Ryo
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf