Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: a pilot study in rabbit bone
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, ISSN 1549-3296, E-ISSN 1552-4965, Vol. 101A, no 2, p. 465-471Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Osseointegration of surface-modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants was studied in vivo. A total of 18 cylinder-shaped PEEK implants were inserted in the femurs of nine New Zealand rabbits; half were coated with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nanoHA) and half were uncoated controls. Healing time was 6 weeks. Samples were retrieved with the implant and surrounding tissue, processed to cut and ground sections, and analyzed histomorphometrically. The implant surfaces were analyzed with optical interferometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). NanoHA-coated PEEK surfaces had lower height deviation (Sa) than controls [mean ± SD: 0.41 μm (± 0.14) vs. 0.96 μm (± 0.28)]. SEM images showed the nanoHA crystals as a thin layer on the polymer surface. XPS analysis of the coated implants showed a Ca/P ratio of 1.67. Histomorphometry indicated that the nanoHA-coated implants had more bone-to-implant contact [16% (± 4.7) vs. 13% (± 9.3)] and more bone area [52% (± 9.5) vs. 45% (± 11.9)]. We found no difference between smooth nanoHA-coated cylinder-shaped PEEK implants and uncoated controls. However, higher mean bone-to-implant contact indicated better osseointegration in the coated implants than in the uncoated controls. The large number of lost implants was interpreted as a lack of primary stability due to implant design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Vol. 101A, no 2, p. 465-471
Keywords [en]
PEEK, polyetheretherketone, hydroxyapatite, nanotopography, osseointegration
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15531DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34358ISI: 000312728000018PubMedID: 22865597Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84872680339Local ID: 16760OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15531DiVA, id: diva2:1419053
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wennerberg, Ann

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wennerberg, Ann
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf