Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Microbial analysis of subgingival plaque samples compared to that of whole saliva in patients with periodontitis
Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Bernhard Gottlieb School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Central Laboratory, Bernhard Gottlieb School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Division Of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb School of Dentistry, Medical University Of Vienna, Austria.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8279-7943
Karl Donath Laboratory for Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Journal of Periodontology, ISSN 0022-3492, E-ISSN 1943-3670, Vol. 85, no 6, p. 819-828Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The detection of special bacterial species in patients with periodontitis is considered to be useful for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The collection of subgingival plaque samples is the common way for the determination of periodontopathic bacteria. However, recently, salivary analysis has been discussed as an advantageous future diagnostic method for periodontitis because it offers simple quantitative sampling and the possibility to assess various bacteria. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to investigate whether there is a correlation between the results of different bacterial species in saliva and subgingival plaque samples from individuals with aggressive periodontitis (AgP) and chronic periodontitis (CP). METHODS: Whole saliva and subgingival plaque samples from the deepest pocket of each quadrant were collected from 43 patients with CP and 33 patients with AgP. Twenty different bacterial species from both samplings were determined by the 16S ribosomal RNA-based polymerase chain reaction with microarray technique. RESULTS: All bacterial species were detected in salivary and subgingival plaque samples. For Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia, as well as Actinomyces viscosus, Campylobacter rectus/showae, Prevotella intermedia, Parvimonas micra, Eubacterium nodatum, and Campylobacter gracilis, a significant positive correlation between salivary and subgingival plaque samples was detected in patients with both types of periodontitis. There were no significant differences in bacteria in salivary and subgingival plaque samples between AgP and CP. CONCLUSION: Salivary analysis might be discussed as a potential alternative to subgingival plaque sampling for microbiologic analysis in both AgP and CP.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Vol. 85, no 6, p. 819-828
Keywords [en]
microbiology, classification
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15516DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.130306ISI: 000337151800018PubMedID: 24144271Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84903436418Local ID: 27576OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15516DiVA, id: diva2:1419037
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bertl, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bertl, Kristina
In the same journal
Journal of Periodontology
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 22 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf