Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The influence of 1α.25-dihydroxyvitamin d3 coating on implant osseointegration in the rabbit tibia
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3460-3374
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research, E-ISSN 2029-283X, Vol. 5, no 3, article id e3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate bone response to an implant surface modified by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1.25-(OH)2D3] in vivo and the potential link between 1.25-(OH) 2D3 surface concentration and bone response. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight implants were divided into 4 groups (1 uncoated control, 3 groups coated with 1.25-(OH)2D3 in concentrations of 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) M respectively), placed in the rabbit tibia for 6 weeks. Topographical analyses were carried out on coated and uncoated discs using interferometer and atomic-force-microscope (AFM). Twenty-eight implants were histologically observed (bone-to-implant-contact [BIC] and new-bone-area [NBA]). RESULTS: The results showed that the 1.25-(OH)2D3 coated implants presented a tendency to osseointegrate better than the non-coated surfaces, the differences were not significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of 1.25-(OH)2D3 coating to implants suggested possible dose dependent effects, however no statistical differences could be found. It is thought that the base substrate topography (turned) could not sustain sufficient amount of 1.25-(OH)2D3 enough to present significant biologic responses. Thus, development a base substrate that can sustain 1.25-(OH)2D3 for a long period is necessary in future studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
STILUS OPTIMUS , 2014. Vol. 5, no 3, article id e3
Keywords [en]
Dental implants, Vitamin D, Drug dose response relationship, Histological techniques, Bone formation
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15392DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2014.5303PubMedID: 25386230Local ID: 18141OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15392DiVA, id: diva2:1418913
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Naito, YoshihitoJimbo, RyoVandeweghe, StefanChrcanovic, BrunoWennerberg, Ann

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Naito, YoshihitoJimbo, RyoVandeweghe, StefanChrcanovic, BrunoWennerberg, Ann
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf