Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Surgical treatment of recurring ameloblastoma, are there options?
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Infectious Medicine, F59, Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Maxillofacial Unit, The Central County Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN 0266-4356, E-ISSN 1532-1940, Vol. 51, no 8, p. 762-766Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Our aim was to evaluate the treatment given to patients with intraosseus ameloblastomas with special emphasis on recurrence and the outcomes of primary and secondary resection. Forty-eight patients who were treated for intraosseous ameloblastoma at 8 centres across Sweden met the inclusion criteria. They showed typical distribution of age, sex, site of lesion, and characteristic presenting features. Eleven of the 48 were initially treated with radical resection and none recurred. Twenty-two of the remaining 37 who were initially treated by conservative resection presented with recurrences. Sixteen of the 22 then had conservative secondary resections, which resulted in further recurrence in 6 patients. Initial radical resection is therefore superior to conservative management as far as recurrences are concerned. We argue, however, that a conservative surgical approach is adequate for many intraosseous ameloblastomas with limited extension, because relapse can be followed by radical resection if clinically indicated in selected cases.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2013. Vol. 51, no 8, p. 762-766
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15308DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.08.013ISI: 000329010100017PubMedID: 24050920Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84889878227Local ID: 16336OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15308DiVA, id: diva2:1418829
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Abrahamsson, PeterWarfvinge, Gunnar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Abrahamsson, PeterWarfvinge, Gunnar
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf