Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implant dentistry education in Europe: 5 years after the Association for Dental Education in Europe consensus report
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1004-0279
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
2014 (English)In: European journal of dental education, ISSN 1396-5883, E-ISSN 1600-0579, Vol. 18, no S1, p. 43-51Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: To promote consensus on implant dentistry university education in Europe, a workshop amongst university teachers and opinion leaders was organised in 2008. As a result, guidelines on both under-and postgraduate education were issued. This study aims to investigate the current status of university teaching of implant dentistry and the impact of the recommendations for teaching and assessment, 5 years after the first consensus. Finally, this report attempts to identify future directions in education within the discipline. Materials and methods: An online survey was distributed amongst 105 academic leaders in implant education in Europe, and 52 questionnaires were returned (response rate 50%). Results: The average amount of implant dentistry in undergraduate curricula has increased to 74 h, compared to 36 h in 2008, and the inclusion of pre-clinical and clinical education has increased. No change occurred with regard to the aimed competence levels. It was suggested that certain implant procedures including surgery should be provided by dentists after attending additional courses, whilst complex treatments will still require specialist training. The 2008 workshop guidelines have been implemented to a varying extent (25-100%) in under-and postgraduate education. Main reported implementation barriers included limited time availability in the curriculum and limited financial/material resources. Future discussions about implant dentistry in Europe should be focused towards integration in current dental curricula, approaches to overcome barriers and the relations with and role of industrial partners. Conclusion: Implant dentistry is increasingly integrating in undergraduate dental education. Development of the consensus guidelines in 2008 may have facilitated this process. Nevertheless, further progress is needed on all educational levels to align training of professionals to the growing treatment needs of the population.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Vol. 18, no S1, p. 43-51
Keywords [en]
implant dentistry, dental curriculum, undergraduate education, postgraduate education
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-15303DOI: 10.1111/eje.12084ISI: 000337520900006PubMedID: 24484519Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84893378367Local ID: 27450OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-15303DiVA, id: diva2:1418824
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Vandeweghe, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vandeweghe, Stefan
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
European journal of dental education
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf