Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of patient characteristics on orthopaedic and trauma patients' perceptions of individualised nursing care
University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kristianstad University, Kristianstad.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, ISSN 1744-1595, E-ISSN 1744-1609, Vol. 8, no 4, p. 259-267Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Rationale and objectives  Relatively few studies have investigated the relationship between patient characteristics and individualised care, in relation to the improvement of care efficiency, efficacy and quality. Individualised care is a key concept in health strategy and policy in Western countries. The aim of this exploratory study was to identify orthopaedic and trauma patients' characteristics relating to their perceptions of individualised nursing care in Western hospital settings. Methods  A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among orthopaedic and trauma patients (n = 1126) from acute care in hospitals from five countries: Finland, Greece, Sweden, the UK and the USA, in 2005-06. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance and a multivariate analysis of variance (manova) of the main effects. Results  The separate examination of each background factor showed statistically significant differences between patients' perceptions of individualised care. In the multivariate analysis the statistically significant main effects, associated with patients' perceptions, were age, gender, education and type of admission. These explained 13% of the variance in the support of patient individuality in care and 19% in perceived individuality in care received. Conclusions  These results can be used in individualising care to different patient groups and in prioritising and focusing quality programs to improve care. Detailed questions about specific aspects of patients' experiences are likely to be more useful in monitoring hospital performance from the patients' perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 8, no 4, p. 259-267
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-14734DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00185.xISI: 000213368100005PubMedID: 21091892Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-79952110249Local ID: 11055OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-14734DiVA, id: diva2:1418255
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Idvall, Ewa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Idvall, Ewa
By organisation
Faculty of Health and Society (HS)
In the same journal
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf