Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Long-term Efficacy of a Resilient Appliance in TMD Pain Patients. A Randomized, Controlled Trial (Stockholm)
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5635-1887
2009 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Treatment with intraoral appliances is often used to reduce pain and functional disturbances in patients with TMD. In text-books the resilient appliance/soft splint is a recommended type of intraoral appliance in patients with TMD. It is easy to produce and constitutes a relatively inexpensive treatment. A recently published randomized controlled trial showed no difference in efficacy between the resilient appliance compared to the control appliance in a short-term perspective in patients with TMD-pain. Aim: To investigate the long-term efficacy of the resilient appliance in patients with TMD-pain. Methods: A randomized, controlled trial was performed in 80 recruited TMD pain patients. They were randomly allocated to one of two groups: treatment with a resilient appliance or treatment with a hard, palatal, non-occluding appliance. Primary treatment outcome measures were judged positive when patients’ TMD-pain at worst (VAS) and CPI decreased by at least 30%. Additional treatment outcomes were frequency of TMD-pain, jaw function/activity and headache the last six months. Results: Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences between groups neither regarding frequency of TMD-pain, jaw function/activity and headache the last six months, nor regarding a 30% reduction in pain at worst and CPI. There were however statistically significant differences within the groups regarding reduced pain intensity, frequency and enhanced jaw function between baseline and 12 months follow-up. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the resilient appliance and the non-occluding control appliance in reducing TMD pain, jaw function/activity and headache in a 12 months perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009.
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-12088Local ID: 9249OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-12088DiVA, id: diva2:1409134
Conference
Odontologiska Riksstämman, Stockholm, Sweden (2009)
Available from: 2020-02-29 Created: 2020-02-29 Last updated: 2022-06-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Ekberg, EwaCarin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekberg, EwaCarin
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf