Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bildung-perspectives in curriculum subjects
Malmö University, Faculty of Education and Society (LS), Department of Natural Science, Mathematics and Society (NMS).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3083-1716
2019 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Bildung is the German and international term for an educational-philosophical key idea (e.g. Horlacher, 2016). In the German/Danish/Norweigan Didaktik-tradition the notion of Bildung is central. Especially Klafki (2000) has been central in consolidating this relationship. He identified two main orientations in the understanding of the concept of Bildung: material and formal Bildung, respectively. Furthermore, he also argued for a position mixing these two views and called it categorical Bildung. More recently, for example Kemp (2005) applied the thinking of Klafki on ideas about our latemodern society. Furthermore, he discussed views of the “world citizen”. In teaching practice Didaktik-models can be used both as tools for analysis and as tools in planning of teaching (e.g. Jank & Meyer, 2003). Klafki developed Didaktik-models for Bildung-oriented Didaktik. For the science subjects (especially chemistry) professor Ingo Eilks from University of Bremen with coworkers have formulated and empirically evaluated a framework for socio-critical and Bildung-oriented science teaching (e.g. Marks et al., 2014). I myself have together with especially Eilks further elaborated on the Bildung-concept in relation to the science subjects (e.g. Sjöström, 2013; Sjöström et al., 2017). Much of this thinking – about the curriculum subjects’ relationship to sustainability issues, democracy, citizenship etc. – is relevant beyond science education (Sjöström, 2018). In this paper I will take my thinking and writing about Bildung-oriented science education as a point of departure and suggest core ideas that are common for several curriculum subjects. By making such a pendulum – from the general ideas by Klafki and Kemp, to discussing and empirically evaluating its implications on a specific curriculum subject (area), and then back to elaborating on the general views of it – I think it is possible to more in detail understand and problematize Bildung-perspectives in different curriculum subjects. It can also contribute to the discussion about the educated citizen in our latemodern knowledge and risk society.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. p. 842-843
Keywords [en]
Bildung, Klafki, Didaktik, global citizenship, världsmedborgare, bildningsorienterad ämnesundervisning, hållbarhetsorienterad ämnesundervisning
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-11503Local ID: 30619OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-11503DiVA, id: diva2:1408547
Conference
Nordic Educational Research Association (NERA), Uppsala, Sweden (March 6-8)
Available from: 2020-02-29 Created: 2020-02-29 Last updated: 2022-04-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

http://www.nfpf.net/

Authority records

Sjöström, Jesper

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjöström, Jesper
By organisation
Department of Natural Science, Mathematics and Society (NMS)
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 86 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf