Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Automated Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment: Student Experience and Development
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), School of Arts and Communication (K3).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), School of Arts and Communication (K3).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), School of Arts and Communication (K3).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3352-4102
2015 (English)In: Learning and Teaching Writing Online: Strategies for Success / [ed] Mary Deane, Teresa Guasch, Brill Academic Publishers, 2015, p. 31-45Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Nowadays, e-platforms designed specifically to cater for academic writing offer a new range of feedback possibilities for instructors. On our writing courses we use automated feedback, that is, metalinguistic comments generated within the e-platform on skill-building assignments in the form of multiple-choice exercises pertaining to the surface-level features of writing: grammar, punctuation, and citation conventions. In this chapter we explore the impact that automated feedback has on student experience of learning and development of skills pertaining to these features from beginner to advanced courses. Some of the key features of automated feedback which we consider are immediacy, metalinguistic explanations, and links to additional readings and exercises. We suggest that surface-level features can successfully be taught as part of academic writing courses, but the focus should be on improving writing fluency rather than language proficiency. Automated feedback on surface-level features is a particularly successful form of feedback on both our beginner and intermediate courses, but it performs less successfully on our advanced-level courses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Brill Academic Publishers, 2015. p. 31-45
Series
Studies in Writing, ISSN 1572-6304 ; 29
Keywords [en]
writing, feedback, blended learning, EFL, higher education
National Category
Humanities and the Arts
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-9184DOI: 10.1163/9789004290846_004Local ID: 21963ISBN: 9789004290846 ISBN: 9789004290358 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-9184DiVA, id: diva2:1406216
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2022-06-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Finnegan, DamianKauppinen, AskoWärnsby, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Finnegan, DamianKauppinen, AskoWärnsby, Anna
By organisation
School of Arts and Communication (K3)
Humanities and the Arts

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 43 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf