Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Early, delayed, or late single implant placement: 10-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8161-3754
2014 (English)In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, ISSN 0905-7161, E-ISSN 1600-0501, Vol. 25, no 12, p. 1359-1365Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim: The aim of this study was to present the 10-year clinical and radiographic data from a RCT on single-tooth implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction. Materials and Methods: Sixty-three patients were randomly allocated to three groups and received an implant on average 10 days (Ea), 3 months (De), or 17 months (La) after tooth extraction. Second-stage surgery was performed after 3 months of submerged healing; metal-ceramic crowns were cemented after one additional month. Standardized periapical radiographs were taken 1 week after implant placement (TP), 1 week (TC) and 1–1.5 year (T1) after crown delivery, and 10 years after implant placement (T10). Pocket depth (PD) and bleeding on probing were registered during controls (TC – T10). Results: Two Ea and one De implants failed to osseointegrate. Seven patients (4 Ea, 1 De, and 2 La) were not available at T10. No significant differences were found among groups regarding implant survival or radiographic peri-implant marginal bone levels (Ea: 1.15 0.77; De: 1.53 1.06; La: 1.42 1.07) at T10. Similarly, no differences were observed among groups in the number of implants with PD ≥5 mm (Ea: 29%; De: 35%; La: 44%) or the average depth of the sites with PD ≥5 mm (Ea: 5.4 0.7; De: 6.1 1.4; La: 5.4 0.5) at T10. Peri-implant mucositis was found in 70% of the cases; peri-implantitis was diagnosed only in two implants (1 De, 1 La) corresponding to 4.3%. Conclusion: Single-tooth implants placed early or delayed after tooth extraction show high survival rates and limited peri-implant marginal bone resorption or biological complications, similar to what is observed with implants placed according to the conventional (late) protocol.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Vol. 25, no 12, p. 1359-1365
Keywords [en]
delayed implantation, dental implant, early implantation, late implantation, randomized controlled trial, single-tooth
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-6844DOI: 10.1111/clr.12273ISI: 000345152600006PubMedID: 25040354Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84911994645Local ID: 16297OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-6844DiVA, id: diva2:1403795
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopushttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.12273/abstract

Authority records

Stavropoulos, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stavropoulos, Andreas
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf