Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality of life in patients with dental conditions: comparing patients' and providers' evaluation
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Health Services Research Unit, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Community Dental Health, ISSN 0265-539X, Vol. 26, no 4, p. 234-238Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective. To measure the agreement between patients and their caregivers in evaluating patients’ oral quality of life. Basic research design. Cross-sectional study. Clinical setting. Data collected in four Swedish dental clinics in 2004. Participants. Consecutive patients. Data were completed for 444 patients. Fifteen dentists and 12 dental hygienists agreed to participate. Interventions. For each patient, the patient him/herself and his/her caregiver completed the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), a specific instrument used to measure quality of life in oral conditions, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. Information on personal and clinical characteristics of patients were also collected. Main outcome measures. Median OHIP-14 scores given by caregivers and patients were calculated and compared in different subgroups of patients. Cohen’s kappa was calculated to measure the agreement between the evaluation of patients and caregivers. Results. OHIP-14 scores median values were 3.0 among patients and 9.0 among caregivers. Caregivers always gave a higher score than patients, especially in older patients and patients with lower education. The concordance between patients’ and caregivers’ evaluation was very low (for different OHIP-14 cutoffs: Cohen’s kappa from 0.10 to 0.15). Conclusions. In this study, great discrepancies were observed between patients and caregivers in the evaluation of patients’ oral quality of life, with caregivers overestimating the burden of dental conditions on patients. It is important to improve patient-caregiver communication, in order to increase patient satisfaction and provide better care. A good patient-caregiver relationship is essential for the patients’ well-being and their adherence to treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 26, no 4, p. 234-238
Keywords [en]
communication, odontology, quality of life.
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-6708DOI: 10.1922/CDH_2304Sampogna05ISI: 000276266500008PubMedID: 20088222Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-56749147297Local ID: 9431OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-6708DiVA, id: diva2:1403658
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-05-22Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Quality of life and severity assessment by provider and patient in oral and skin conditions
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Quality of life and severity assessment by provider and patient in oral and skin conditions
2010 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A good communication between patient and provider has the aimto understand the patient’s problems, to establish and maintain acaring relation, and to inform about disease. The quality of communicationmay have an influence on different important aspects, suchas satisfaction and adherence to treatment.In this thesis, the overairching aim was to evaluate the effects ofthe communication between patient and provider, by comparing theirevaluation of either the health-related quality of life of patients, or theseverity of the disease.It was chosen to focus on oral and dermatological conditions, sinceskin and teeth are some of the most important components of the appearanceof a person, and conditions which affect them can have deeppsychosocial implications on patients’ life.Paper I concerns skin conditions. Dermatologists’ opinions on skinhealth-related quality of life and psychological problems in patientswere compared to the patients’ reports.Papers II and III concern oral conditions. The evaluation of oralhealth-related quality of life problems in patients by the caregivers wascompared to the evaluation given by patients.In Paper IV, about oral mucosal conditions, the comparison wasmade between the evaluation of the severity of the disease by patientsand providers.Paper I: as regards quality of life, physicians tended to overestimateimpairment in several conditions, particularly in alopecia. In many diagnosticcategories, an underestimation of the frequency of depressionand anxiety by dermatologists was observed. Paper II and III: the correlation between patients’ and caregivers’evaluation of oral health-related quality of life was low. In general, caregiverstended to overestimate the quality of life impairment of their patients,particularly for women, for elderly people, and for patients witha low number of teeth. The difference between patient and caregiverevaluation did not depend on the professional status of the caregiver(dentist or hygienist), nor on the clinics.Paper IV: in oral mucosal conditions, the agreement between patients’and providers’ evaluation of severity was very low. Physicians tended tounderestimate severity more in older than in younger patients, and inpatients with a higher quality of life impairment compared to the others.The underestimation by the physician was also positively associatedto psychological problems and the presence of alexithymia.This thesis showed a low agreement between patient and provider inthe evaluation of quality of life and psychological problems of patients,and of the disease severity, both in dental and dermatological conditions.The discrepancies were both in the direction of an underestimationand an overestimation by the caregiver.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology, Department of Oral Public Health, 2010
Series
Doctoral Dissertation in Odontology
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-7656 (URN)10168 (Local ID)91-7104-310-1 (ISBN)10168 (Archive number)10168 (OAI)
Note

Note: The papers are not included in the fulltext online.

Paper IV in dissertation as manuscript with title "Comparison of patients’ and providers’ severity evaluation of oral mucosal diseases".

Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Johansson, VeronicaAxtelius, BjörnSöderfeldt, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, VeronicaAxtelius, BjörnSöderfeldt, Björn
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Community Dental Health
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf