Malmö University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The dentist's communicative role in prosthodontic treatment
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Inst. for Postgrad. Dent. Educ. Ctr., Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
2004 (English)In: International Journal of Prosthodontics, ISSN 0893-2174, E-ISSN 1139-9791, Vol. 17, no 6, p. 666-671Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: Dentist-patient verbal communicatioo is important for patient satisfaction The aim of this study was to investigate the dentist´s role in the provider-patient relationship as to verbal communication and patient satisfaction with the treatment outcome in prosthetic dentistry. The dentist-specific properties were analyzed in random coefficient modeling MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one dentist-patient pairs were followed through 61 prosthodontic treatment periods. The treatment performed was ftxed prosthodontic restorations on teeth or implants One encounter at the end of each treatment period was tape recorded. The verbal communication on the recordings was analyzed using an interaction analysis instrument. Various measures of communication were used, summarizing the variational pattern of verbal interaction. Two differrent aspects of the patient satisfaction concept were used as dependent variables: cure (overall patient satisfaction with prosthodontic treatment), and care (patient satisfaction with a particular dental encounter during the prosthodontic treatment period). RESULTS: In the multilevel model for care, the dentist variance was mostly explained by the communication variables. In the cure model, there was no dentist variance. The communication patterns used by the dentists thus influenced patient satisfaction in a shortterm perspective but not in an intermediate perspective. CONCLUSION: Patient evaluation of the care during an encounter is dependent on the dentist´s verbal communication activity during the encounter, but this communication has no impact on the patient evaluation of overall prosthetic treatment outcome in the intermediate time perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Quintessence , 2004. Vol. 17, no 6, p. 666-671
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-5721ISI: 000225364100006PubMedID: 15686094Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-10444244068Local ID: 2975OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-5721DiVA, id: diva2:1402590
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

PubMedScopus

Authority records

Söderfeldt, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderfeldt, Björn
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
International Journal of Prosthodontics
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf