Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Remission in schizophrenia: analysis in a naturalistic setting
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Health and Society (HS).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9227-8987
2009 (English)In: Comprehensive Psychiatry, ISSN 0010-440X, E-ISSN 1532-8384, Vol. 50, no 3, p. 200-208Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the recently defined Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia remission criteria in a naturalistic setting of psychotic patients; to identify causal factors that change remission status; and to validate the criteria against global indices of illness, cognitive functions, and social outcome. METHODS: This was a longitudinal naturalistic study of 162 patients, diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-related psychotic disorders (mean illness duration, 11 years) and treated with risperidone at study entry. Symptoms, drug treatment, cognitive function, and social outcome were measured at baseline and annually for 5 years. Remission was constructed retrospectively with only indirect data on stability over time. RESULTS: At study entry, 40% of the patients with schizophrenia were in symptomatic remission, stabilizing between 55% and 60% after a few years. The need for hospitalization became less frequent over time; initially 31%, dropping to 7% by years 4 and 5. Many patients went in and out of remission. Remission was strongly associated with global indices of illness, with intact insight and with social outcome (except work/studies) but not with cognition or medication. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of certain weaknesses of the study, we may conclude that current definition of remission is primarily a symptomatic measure, covering a subset of symptoms, some of which are not schizophrenia-specific. Although the definition may be clinically relevant, we must be aware of the risk that the connotation of the word could induce too much focus on symptom control.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2009. Vol. 50, no 3, p. 200-208
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-4658DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.08.010ISI: 000265655400002PubMedID: 19374962Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-64149090606Local ID: 9334OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-4658DiVA, id: diva2:1401492
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2025-06-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Levander, Sten

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Levander, Sten
By organisation
Faculty of Health and Society (HS)
In the same journal
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf