Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Collaborative challenges and barriers when planning and implementing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): Lessons from Swedish BRT projects
Lund University. (K2 The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport)
Lund University. (K2 The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport)
Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society (KS), Department of Urban Studies (US). (K2 The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9445-784X
2023 (English)In: Urban, Planning and Transport Research, ISSN 2165-0020, Vol. 11, no 1, article id 2246530Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this paper is to improve the knowledge of collaborative challenges when planning and implementing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Collaborative challenges are here understood as the barriers that may arise in BRT planning and implementation as a consequence of several formally independent actors, occasionally with different interests, participating in the planning. The results are based on an analysis of actor interactions in Swedish BRT projects. These projects are analysed in relation to the state of the art in the research field of collaborative approaches. The results show two main and interrelated collaborative challenges. The first category of challenges concerns difficulties for actors in creating a common understanding of what a BRT system is, the second category concerns details of bus priority measures, e.g. busways, priority at intersections, and how to handle and deal with conflicting interests when removing speed bumps or pedestrian and cycle crossings. In terms of policy is in the early stages of the planning processes. This can be generated by working practices and tools that facilitate agreements on how to handle different interests and trade-offs. BRT guidelines adapted to national transport policy, legal and organisational conditions could function as tools in assisting actor dialogue.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 11, no 1, article id 2246530
Keywords [en]
Bus rapid transit, BRT, collaboration, barriers, planning, implementation
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Research subject
Transportation studies; Organisational studies; Urban studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-61832DOI: 10.1080/21650020.2023.2246530Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85167797805OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-61832DiVA, id: diva2:1787382
Funder
Swedish Transport AdministrationAvailable from: 2023-08-14 Created: 2023-08-14 Last updated: 2023-08-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1645 kB)68 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1645 kBChecksum SHA-512
56e8826701877ad0653ce06d759cf4a3a8891669f053ec318d68fa0bfc15bc8b3eedce3934b61ee6cc48b8e14cfb3cabd1822137238f5f4a975b4ac3d871137e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hrelja, Robert

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hrelja, Robert
By organisation
Department of Urban Studies (US)
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 68 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf