Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impact of salivary contamination during implant placement with different surface characteristics in native and augmented bone: An in vivo study in sheep calvaria model
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD). Section of Implant and Rehabilitative Dentistry, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9144-3442
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2893-3676
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6260-473X
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, ISSN 0905-7161, E-ISSN 1600-0501, Vol. 34, no 3, p. 254-262Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether salivary contamination during placement of implants with different surface characteristics affects osseointegration in native and in augmented bone areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty eight implants with machined surface (MS) and 48 implants with moderately rough surface (RS) were tested in the calvaria of 12 sheep. At the first surgery, 64 bony critical defects were randomly created and were subsequently augmented with two materials (autogenous or bovine bone). After 5 weeks of graft healing, 8 implants were placed per sheep, in native bone and in the centre of the augmented defects. Forty eight implants were soaked with saliva before placement (contaminated group [CG]), while 48 implants were not (non-contaminated group [NCG]). Five weeks after implant placement, bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone material area fraction occupancy (BMAFO) were calculated histomorphometrically.

RESULTS: Saliva contamination showed a significant negative effect (p = .000) on BIC, especially in augmented areas. RS showed significant positive effect on BIC, compared to MS (p = .000), while there were no significant differences for different bone conditions (p = .103). For BMAFO, the contamination showed a significantly negative affect (p = .000), while there were no significant differences for surface characteristics (p = .322) and for bone condition (p = .538).

CONCLUSION: Saliva contamination during dental implant placement has a negative effect on osseointegration in augmented areas. Moderately rough surface has a possible advantage in the aspect of initial bone to implant contact. However, it seems to be advisable to avoid saliva contamination especially for implants placed in augmented bone areas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2023. Vol. 34, no 3, p. 254-262
Keywords [en]
bacteria, bone, dental implants, osseointegration, saliva
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-58544DOI: 10.1111/clr.14038ISI: 000928912200001PubMedID: 36695016Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85147494618OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-58544DiVA, id: diva2:1741302
Available from: 2023-03-03 Created: 2023-03-03 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4632 kB)335 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4632 kBChecksum SHA-512
81167e17ce6bdd52b8b99b27683c153eb2f06a2baff371685194e1c405c46680173794c60154c4a4d02e09e2e76ddfa9c512c10381cef82bd12d6985b3ec1937
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jinno, YoheiStocchero, MicheleToia, MarcoPapia, EvaggeliaAhmad, MarianneBecktor, Jonas P

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jinno, YoheiStocchero, MicheleToia, MarcoPapia, EvaggeliaAhmad, MarianneBecktor, Jonas P
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 336 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 122 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf