Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of post-treatment changes with and without retention in adolescents treated for maxillary impacted canines: a randomised controlled trial
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4588-3543
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0009-0001-8816-4952
2021 (English)In: European Journal of Orthodontics, ISSN 0141-5387, E-ISSN 1460-2210, Vol. 43, no 2, p. 121-127, article id cjaa010Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To evaluate whether retention is needed after orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canines.

Trial design: Two-arm parallel group single-centre randomized controlled trial.

Materials and methods: Sixty-three patients, 39 girls and 24 boys, were recruited to the study. The inclusion criteria were patients with at least one impacted or unerupted maxillary canine, and moderate irregularity of the maxillary six anterior teeth according to Little’s index (LI). After gaining informed consent from the patient and their custodians, the patients were randomized to one of two groups, i.e. to a non-retention group or a retention group. The randomization process was prepared and carried out by an independent person not involved in the trial and the randomization used blocks of 20 (10 + 10). Primary outcomes were changes in single contact point discrepancy, and LI measured on digitalized three-dimensional study casts 1-year post-treatment. The study casts were anonymized before assessment and the changes were blinded for the assessor. Data were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. Thus, all randomized patients were incorporated into the final analysis. In the non-retention group a 10-week interim period was used to detect patients who eventually have a relapse immediately after treatment. If so, the patient got the arch-wire reinserted. Most patients in the retention group received a vacuum-formed retainer and pretreatment spacing cases got a bonded retainer.

Results: Mean irregularity change was 0.4 mm in the retention and 1.3 mm in the non-retention group (P < 0.001). Maximum change was 2.5 mm in the retention and 3.2 mm in the non-retention group (P < 0.001). Most changes in the non-retention group occurred during the 10-week interim period. In the non-retention group, one patient developed contact point discrepancy of >2 mm during the interim period and was realigned.HarmsOne patient met the stopping guideline criteria. This patient had the arch wire reinserted for 2 months. After realignment, the patient received a retention appliance.LimitationsThe trial was a single-centre study and short-term changes were evaluated.

Conclusions: Changes between the retention and the non-retention group were statistically but not clinically significant. Since satisfactory clinical results 1-year post-treatment were found in the non-retention group, retention does not appear to be needed. The 10-week interim period was useful in detecting patients who might have a relapse immediately after treatment.

Trial registration: The trial was not registered.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2021. Vol. 43, no 2, p. 121-127, article id cjaa010
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-39499DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa010ISI: 000648939600001PubMedID: 32133486Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85104046910OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-39499DiVA, id: diva2:1520147
Available from: 2021-01-20 Created: 2021-01-20 Last updated: 2024-03-18Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Stability of aligned maxillary anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment: amount of changes with different retention methods and without retention
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Stability of aligned maxillary anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment: amount of changes with different retention methods and without retention
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Well-aligned anterior teeth are the major reason for the patients seeking orthodontic treatment, and keeping teeth aligned and stable afterwards is a goal for the orthodontist and the patient. Relapse after treatment is a common problem, and it is defined as when teeth go back to their previous positions. Removable or fixed retainers have been used to avoid relapse after treatment. It has been common practice to use removable retention to retain anterior teeth in the maxilla. However, in recent decades, it has become increasingly common to retain with bonded retainers.

Almost all previous studies on retention devices in the maxilla were based on removable retainers. Consequently, there existed knowledge gaps and lack of short-term and long-term studies on the capability to maintain the stability of the maxillary anterior teeth with bonded retainers. Hence, the reason for the papers in this study. In addition, it is not known if retentionis needed in all orthodontic patients or if there are patients, based on their initial malocclusion and individual variations, who may not need retention after treatment.

The research questions addressed in this thesis thus originate from knowledgegaps and clinical needs concerning retention strategies after orthodontic treatments. To provide strong clinical evidence, randomised controlled trials (RCT) as well as intention to treat (ITT) methodology has been assessed. The results are expected to be beneficial for the patients who will be offered the most effective retention strategy for maxillary anterior teeth based on patients’ preferences.

In Paper I and II, 45 and 27 adolescents’ patients were collected from the Orthodontic Clinic in Mariestad, Sweden. At the time when Paper Iand II were conducted, there were no studies that had evaluated the longterm effect of bonded retainers in the maxilla. In two RCTs, Paper III and IV, 90 and 63 adolescents’ patients were collected from the Orthodontic Clinic in Växjö, Region Kronoberg, Sweden.

Paper I: The aim was to investigate the amount and pattern of relapse of maxillary anterior teeth previously retained with a bonded retainer.

Paper II: The aim was to investigate the amount and pattern of changes of maxillary anterior teeth seven years post-retention, which previously were retained with a bonded retainer.

Paper III: The aim was to evaluate post-treatment changes in the irregularity of the maxillary six anterior teeth and single tooth Contact Point Discrepancy (CPD) of three different retention methods.

Paper IV: The aim was to evaluate whether retention is needed after orthodontic treatment for impacted maxillary canines and with moderate pre-treatment irregularity in the maxilla.

Key findings in Paper I

• The contact relationship between the laterals and the centrals is the most unstable   contact. Canines are the most stable teeth.

• There was no difference in the relapse pattern between rotational displacements and labiolingual displacement.

Key findings in Paper II

• There was a strong correlation between irregularity at one- and seven-years post-retention. Stable cases one-year post-retention were stable and unstable cases deteriorated with time.

Key findings in Paper III

• All three retention methods showed equally effective retention capacity and all the changes found in the three groups were small and considered clinically insignificant. Thus, the null hypothesis was confirmed. All three methods can be recommended.

Key findings in Paper IV

• Changes between the retention and the non-retention group were statistically but not clinically significant. Since satisfactory clinical results one-year post-treatment were found in the non-retention group, retention does not appear always to be needed.

• Most of the changes occur within the first 10-week period after treatment with no retention.

Key conclusions and clinical implications

Both removable and bonded retainers are effective for holding teeth inposition and can be used for preventing the relapse. It can be enough toretain with bonded retainer 12-22 instead of 13-23. It might be possibleto avoid retention in selected cases in the short-term, but a longer evaluationperiod is needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö: Malmö universitet, 2021. p. 84
Series
Doctoral Dissertation in Odontology
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-39500 (URN)10.24834/isbn.9789178771523 (DOI)9789178771516 (ISBN)9789178771523 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-02-12, Direktsänd, 09:15
Opponent
Note

Note: The papers are not included in the fulltext online

Available from: 2021-01-20 Created: 2021-01-20 Last updated: 2024-03-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(619 kB)143 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 619 kBChecksum SHA-512
9eddafb632b8e7577fa452183ccda9c017c634a7aed0ae72126c628771529bc4a6c44cbf14832484f6076638c8471663c0212e8a8b62bbef7b459c63f927dd60
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Naraghi, SasanGanzer, NielsBondemark, LarsSonesson, Mikael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Naraghi, SasanGanzer, NielsBondemark, LarsSonesson, Mikael
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
European Journal of Orthodontics
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 143 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 126 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf