Analysis of technical complications and risk factors for failure of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
2020 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 22, no 4, p. 523-532Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND: The oral rehabilitation with fixed restorations supported by the combination of teeth and dental implants has been advocated in some cases.
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcomes of these prostheses. Fixed restorations supported by the combination of teeth and dental implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients treated with combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) at one specialist clinic. Abutment/prosthesis failure and technical complications were the outcomes analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with 96 prostheses were included, with a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. Twenty prostheses failed. The estimated cumulative survival rate was 90.7%, 84.8%, 69.9%, and 66.2% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. The failure of tooth and/or implant abutments in key positions affected the survival of the prostheses. There were seven reasons for prostheses failure, with the loss of abutments exerting a significant influence. Bruxism was possibly associated with failures. Prostheses with cantilevers did not show a statistically significant higher failure rate. No group had a general higher prevalence of technical complications in comparison to the other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although combined tooth-implant-supported FDPs are an alternative treatment option, this study has found that across 20 years of service nearly 35% the prostheses may fail.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 22, no 4, p. 523-532
Keywords [en]
combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis, dental implant, fixed prosthesis, nonrigid connection, survival, technical complications
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-17601DOI: 10.1111/cid.12927ISI: 000539244600001PubMedID: 32524744Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086251774OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-17601DiVA, id: diva2:1449001
2020-06-292020-06-292024-02-05Bibliographically approved