Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment of prognosis and treatment goals among general dental practitioners and dental hygienists
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9449-9073
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6337-4988
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8161-3754
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Clinicians are expected to base their treatment strategies of periodontal diseases on patient history, clinical appearance, and previous experience of periodontal disease. Treatment decisions are influenced by their prognostic assessment and treatment goals. Therefore the aim was to study patterns regarding general dental practitioners (GDPs) and dental hygienists (DHs) a) assessment of prognosis, b) setting of treatment goals, and c) estimation of amount of treatment of cases with varying severity of periodontal disease. Material and Methods: Seventy-seven GDPs and 50 DHs in a Swedish county were invited to participate in a questionnaire study. The response rate was 94 %. The questionnaire included patient history, clinical charts and radiographs, of three patient cases with a varying degree of periodontal diseases. Clinicians that judged these patients as diseased assessed the prognosis, proposed treatment goals and estimated amount of treatment, i.e. number of treatment sessions. The clinicians were compared to each other regarding their prognostic assessment and estimated amount of treatment. ANOVA and Tukey´s test compared the differences in estimated amount of treatment. Results: The majority of clinicians (58-95%) assessed that a worsening of the periodontal condition (assessment of prognosis) should occur. They had different treatment goals. Regardless of the clinicians’ former prognostic assessment there were almost no differences, overall, in estimated number of treatment sessions (p>0.05). The estimated number of treatment sessions ranged from 2 to 3 sessions in all patients. Conclusions: Most clinicians assessed the prognosis as negative. All patients were estimated to require the same amount of treatment even if their periodontal condition differed significantly in severity. This could mean that patients are over- or undertreated in relation to their periodontal condition and indicates that resources are ineffectively used.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , p. 1
Keywords [en]
Clinical decision-making, Periodontitis, Gingivitis, Periodontology, Prognosis, Treatment goals
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-16953Local ID: 18058OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-16953DiVA, id: diva2:1420445
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2024-05-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(187 kB)59 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 187 kBChecksum SHA-512
7ded161abf27a067ed4af4232e60a437ff479a8099f6711eb9b8b145cb2ad7cfde828d0a4e408ab21afba0a33ea07d2e96d96123ba25d034b326d0ee18ab7a10
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Milosavljevic, AleksandarGötrick, BengtHallström, HadarStavropoulos, AndreasKnutsson, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Milosavljevic, AleksandarGötrick, BengtHallström, HadarStavropoulos, AndreasKnutsson, Kerstin
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 59 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf