Malmö University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Validation Study of the Impression Replica Technique.
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö University, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Journal of Prosthodontics, ISSN 1059-941X, E-ISSN 1532-849X, Vol. 28, no 2, p. e609-e616Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To validate the well-known and often-used impression replica technique for measuring fit between a preparation and a crown in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The validation consisted of three steps. First, a measuring instrument was validated to elucidate its accuracy. Second, a specimen consisting of male and female counterparts was created and validated by the measuring instrument. Calculations were made for the exact values of three gaps between the male and female. Finally, impression replicas were produced of the specimen gaps and sectioned into four pieces. The replicas were then measured with the use of a light microscope. The values received from measuring the specimen were then compared with the values received from the impression replicas, and the technique was thereby validated. RESULTS: The impression replica technique overvalued all measured gaps. Depending on location of the three measuring sites, the difference between the specimen and the impression replicas varied from 47 to 130 mum. CONCLUSION: The impression replica technique overestimates gaps within the range of 2% to 11%. The validation of the replica technique enables the method to be used as a reference when testing other methods for evaluating fit in dentistry.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2019. Vol. 28, no 2, p. e609-e616
Keywords [en]
Internal gap, marginal gap, misfit, production tolerance
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-6937DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12795ISI: 000458904300043PubMedID: 29664193Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85045757643Local ID: 26706OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-6937DiVA, id: diva2:1403891
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Braian, MichaelAmeri, ArmanAhlgren, Camilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Braian, MichaelAmeri, ArmanAhlgren, Camilla
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Journal of Prosthodontics
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 43 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf