Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analysis of the bone ultrastructure around biodegradable Mg-xGd implants using small angle X-ray scattering and X-ray diffraction.
Division of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute for Materials Research, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
Division of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute for Materials Research, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
Division of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute for Materials Research, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
Division of Metallic Biomaterials, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute for Materials Research, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Acta Biomaterialia, ISSN 1742-7061, E-ISSN 1878-7568, Vol. 101, no 1, p. 637-645Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Magnesium alloys are increasingly researched as temporary biodegradable metal implants in bone applications due to their mechanical properties which are more similar to bone than conventional implant metals and the fact that Magnesium occurs naturally within the body. However, the degradation processes in vivo and in particular the interaction of the bone with the degrading material need to be further investigated. In this study we are presenting the first quantitative comparison of the bone ultrastructure formed at the interface of biodegradable Mg-5Gd and Mg-10Gd implants and titanium and PEEK implants after 4, 8 and 12 weeks healing time using two-dimensional small angle X-ray scattering and X-ray diffraction. Differences in mineralization, orientation and thickness of the hydroxyapatite are assessed. We find statistically significant (p<0.05) differences for the lattice spacing of the (310)-reflex of hydroxyapatite between titanium and Mg-xGd materials, as well as for the (310) crystal size between titanium and Mg-5Gd, indicating a possible deposition of Mg within the bone matrix. The (310) lattice spacing and crystallite size further differ significantly between implant degradation layer and surrounding bone (p

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 101, no 1, p. 637-645
Keywords [en]
Biodegradable magnesium implants, Bone ultrastructure, Bone-implant interface
National Category
Biomaterials Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-6310DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.030ISI: 000504504300051PubMedID: 31734411Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85075900585Local ID: 30480OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-6310DiVA, id: diva2:1403252
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-04-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2918 kB)585 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2918 kBChecksum SHA-512
4c887563d19638021314072d7685bc222bc50c472aaf28b2c7deac176ed17eee6575caced530a63fae812abd99a3907899abfb548ed2927350c779074081780b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Galli, SilviaWennerberg, Ann

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Galli, SilviaWennerberg, Ann
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)Biofilms Research Center for Biointerfaces
In the same journal
Acta Biomaterialia
Biomaterials Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 586 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 89 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf