Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Radiographic assessment of the marginal bone level after implant treatment: a comparison of periapical and Scanora detailed narrow beam radiography
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Odontology (OD).
2003 (English)In: Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology, ISSN 0250-832X, E-ISSN 1476-542X, Vol. 32, no 2, p. 97-103Article in journal (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To compare assessments of the marginal bone level around dental implants in the mandible using periapical radiography and Scanora detailed narrow beam (DNB) radiography. METHODS: Forty patients treated with Brånemark dental implants in the lower jaw were examined with periapical and Scanora DNB radiography. Ten implants were selected from each of the four dental regions (molar, incisor, canine, premolar), and no more than one implant was selected from the same patient. Seven observers assessed the level of the marginal bone on the mesial and distal surfaces of the implants. Three of the observers made all the assessments twice. RESULTS: Agreement between the methods was 61 %. The highest agreement was found in the molar region. In DNB radiography the marginal bone level was observed to be situated more “coronally” in 17 % and more “apically” in 22 % compared with periapical radiography. The kappa value for interobserver agreement for all observers was 0.33 for periapical radiography and 0.27 for DNB radiography. The weighted kappa value for intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.75 to 0.99 for DNB radiography and from 0.94 to 0.98 for periapical radiography. CONCLUSIONS: Scanora multimodal radiography simplifies examination of implants in the mandible, and observer variation is comparable with that in intraoral periapical radiography.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 32, no 2, p. 97-103
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-5860DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/90063447ISI: 000183491800005PubMedID: 12775663Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0041920918Local ID: 3021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-5860DiVA, id: diva2:1402729
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindh, ChristinaPetersson, Arne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindh, ChristinaPetersson, Arne
By organisation
Faculty of Odontology (OD)
In the same journal
Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf