Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Perceptions of national guidelines and their (non) implementation in mental healthcare: a deductive and inductive content analysis
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8248-8825
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Health and Society (HS), Department of Care Science (VV).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7934-6949
2015 (English)In: Implementation Science, E-ISSN 1748-5908, Vol. 10, no 43, article id 43Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Background National guidelines are being produced at an increasing rate, and politicians and managers are expected to promote these guidelines and their implementation in clinical work. However, research seldom deals with how decision-makers can perceive these guidelines or their challenges in a cultural context. Therefore, the aim of this study was twofold: to investigate how well Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) reflected the empirical reality of mental healthcare and to gain an extended understanding of the perceptions of decision-makers operating within this context, in regard to the implementation of evidence-based guidelines. Methods The study took place in the southeast of Sweden and employed a qualitative design. The data were collected through 23 interviews with politicians and managers working either in the county council or in the municipalities. The transcribed text was analysed iteratively and in two distinct phases, first deductively and second inductively by means of qualitative content analysis. Results Our deductive analysis showed that the text strongly reflected two out of three categorisation matrices, i.e. evidence and context representing the PARIHS framework. However, the key element of facilitation was poorly mirrored in the text. Results from the inductive analysis can be seen in light of the main category sitting on the fence; thus, the informants’ perceptions reflected ambivalence and contradiction. This was illustrated by conflicting views and differences in culture and ideology, a feeling of security in tradition, a certain amount of resistance to change and a lack of role clarity and clear directions. Together, our two analyses provide a rich description of an organisational culture that is highly unlikely to facilitate the implementation of the national guidelines, together with a distrust of the source behind such guidelines, which stands in stark contrast to the high confidence in the knowledge of experienced people in authority within the organisational context. Conclusions Our findings have highlighted that, regardless of by whom guidelines are released, they are not likely to be utilised or implemented if those who are responsible for implementing them do not trust the source. This aspect (i.e. contextual trust) is not covered by PARIHS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2015. Vol. 10, no 43, article id 43
Keywords [en]
evidence-based practice, guidelines, implementation, mental health, nursing, PARIHS, Qualitative research
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-4434DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0234-0ISI: 000352605700001PubMedID: 25888854Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84926655692Local ID: 19844OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-4434DiVA, id: diva2:1401265
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(463 kB)96 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 463 kBChecksum SHA-512
b5c2970c9c074f374dfb68b73c42bfe7d4dd9ce3870b116442f2396acee728129e0d2408a52e3a4818775f3b0037ddca9e76cd6bf8ceafdefb00bde4bc5ddd5e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sandström, BoelWillman, AniaSvensson, BengtBorglin, Gunilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, BoelWillman, AniaSvensson, BengtBorglin, Gunilla
By organisation
Department of Care Science (VV)
In the same journal
Implementation Science
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 96 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf