Publikationer från Malmö universitet
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Second Triennial Systematic Literature Review of European Nursing Research: Impact on Patient Outcomes and Implications for Evidence-Based Practice
Head of Nursing University of Exeter, College of Medicine and Health, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK; Hogskulen pa Vestlandet, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
Universitetssykehuset Nord-Norge, Department of Heart Disease, and University of Tromsø-The Arctic University of Norway, Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tromsø, Norway.
Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för hälsa och samhälle (HS), Institutionen för vårdvetenskap (VV).ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7934-6949
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, ISSN 1545-102X, E-ISSN 1741-6787, Vol. 15, nr 5, s. 333-343Artikel, forskningsöversikt (Refereegranskat)
Abstract [en]

Background: European research in nursing has been criticized as overwhelmingly descriptive, wasteful and with little relevance to clinical practice. This second triennial review follows our previous review of articles published in 2010, to determine whether the situation has changed. Objective: To identify, appraise, and synthesize reports of European nursing research published during 2013 in the top 20 nursing research journals. Methods: Systematic review with descriptive results synthesis. Results: We identified 2,220 reports, of which 254, from 19 European countries, were eligible for analysis; 215 (84.7%) were primary research, 36 (14.2%) secondary research, and three (1.2%) mixed primary and secondary. Forty‐eight (18.9%) of studies were experimental: 24 (9.4%) randomized controlled trials, 11 (4.3%) experiments without randomization, and 13 (5.1%) experiments without control group. A total of 106 (41.7%) articles were observational: 85 (33.5%) qualitative research. The majority (158; 62.2%) were from outpatient and secondary care hospital settings. One hundred and sixty‐five (65.0%) articles reported nursing intervention studies: 77 (30.3%) independent interventions, 77 (30.3%) interdependent, and 11 (4.3%) dependent. This represents a slight increase in experimental studies compared with our previous review (18.9% vs. 11.7%). The quality of reporting remained very poor. Linking Evidence to Action: European research in nursing remains overwhelmingly descriptive. We call on nursing researchers globally to raise the level of evidence and, therefore, the quality of care and patient outcomes. We urge them to replicate our study in their regions, diagnose reasons for the lack of appropriate research, identify solutions, and implement a deliberate, targeted, and systematic global effort to increase the number of experimental, high quality, and relevant studies into nursing interventions. We also call on journal editors to mandate an improvement in the standards of research reporting in nursing journals.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Alpha Beta Sigma, 2018. Vol. 15, nr 5, s. 333-343
Nyckelord [en]
evidence-based practice, health care reform, international health, nurse-midwifery, research methods, systematic review
Nationell ämneskategori
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-836DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12320ISI: 000446672700002PubMedID: 30129094Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85053214566Lokalt ID: 26036OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-836DiVA, id: diva2:1397511
Tillgänglig från: 2020-02-27 Skapad: 2020-02-27 Senast uppdaterad: 2024-06-17Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(430 kB)176 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 430 kBChecksumma SHA-512
b6f1e6e33be76b3dce25d5ec5a042f3629112978ad67661141192260123c0ceb1957ef88f308181b46e5bde284399f655f371ba9efac980584a5cee4378cae6f
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Person

Borglin, Gunilla

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Borglin, Gunilla
Av organisationen
Institutionen för vårdvetenskap (VV)
I samma tidskrift
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Medicin och hälsovetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 176 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 31 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf