Publikationer från Malmö universitet
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Review of PEEK implants and biomechanical and immunological responses to a zirconium phosphate nano-coated PEEK, a blasted PEEK, and a turned titanium implant surface.
Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malmö universitet, Odontologiska fakulteten (OD).ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7488-3588
Promimic AB, AstraZeneca BioVentureHub, Mõlndal, Sweden.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2022 (Engelska)Ingår i: American Journal of Dentistry, ISSN 0894-8275, Vol. 35, nr 2, s. 152-160Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical and immunological reactions to coated and non-coated blasted PEEK implants in vivo after 12 weeks and review the associated literature.

METHODS: Two osteotomy sites were performed in each proximal tibia of 10 lop-eared rabbits (n= 4 per rabbit). Each rabbit received a randomly placed (1) blasted zirconium phosphate nano-coated PEEK- (nano-ZrP), (2) blasted PEEK- (PEEK) and (3) titanium implant (Ti) and an empty sham site. At 12 weeks, removal torque of all implants and biological investigation with qPCR was performed. The implant surfaces were analyzed prior to insertion with interferometry, SEM and XPS.

RESULTS: The interferometry analysis showed that there was no difference in roughness for the uncoated PEEK compared to the ZrP coated PEEK implants. The titanium implants were considerably smoother (Sa= 0.23 µm) than the uncoated Sa= 1.11 µm) and ZrP coated PEEK implants (Sa= 1.12 µm). SEM analysis on the PEEK implants corroborated the interferometry results; no difference in structure between the uncoated vs. the ZrP coated PEEK was visible on the micrometer level. At higher magnifications, the ZrP coating was visible in the SEM as a thin, porous network. All tested implants displayed osseointegration with the highest RTQ for nano-ZrP (18.4 Ncm) followed by PEEK (14.5 Ncm) and Ti (11.5 Ncm). All implants activated the immune system, with elevated macrophage and M2 macrophage qPCR markers at 12 weeks compared to the sham site.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Nano-ZrP coating improves osseointegration of blasted PEEK implants at 12 weeks of follow-up. Osseointegration of titanium, PEEK and nano-ZrP PEEK is not a normal bone healing process, but rather a shield-off mechanism that appears to be regulated by the innate immune system.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Mosher & Linder, Inc. , 2022. Vol. 35, nr 2, s. 152-160
Nationell ämneskategori
Odontologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-56285ISI: 000893228600008PubMedID: 35798711OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-56285DiVA, id: diva2:1714399
Tillgänglig från: 2022-11-29 Skapad: 2022-11-29 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-09-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

PubMed

Person

Galli, SilviaAlbrektsson, TomasWennerberg, Ann

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Galli, SilviaAlbrektsson, TomasWennerberg, Ann
Av organisationen
Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
I samma tidskrift
American Journal of Dentistry
Odontologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 38 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf