Malmö University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transformative agency as social construction: Overcoming knowledge constraints in science, art and technology
Malmö högskola, Faculty of Education and Society (LS), Department of Culture, Languages and Media (KSM).
2017 (English)In: Social Science Information, ISSN 0539-0184, E-ISSN 1461-7412, Vol. 56, no 3, p. 454-476Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A core problem of social constructivist theories of knowledge is the lack of theoretical clarity about the role of knowledge constraints and how they are overcome in practice, by what type of social agency. Knowledge constraints are both special - rules constituting and/or regulating such distinct intellectual fields as science, art and technology - and general - laws working across the nature/culture divide. In order to sort out this complexity of knowledge constraints in science, we need to start by recognizing the existence of knowledge constraints in the first place. Advance of knowledge is not contingent, as claimed by the Strong Program inaugurated by David Bloor. The latter reduces the problem of knowledge constraints to reputational work. But reputational work is what all humans engage in; this is one reason why networking is so crucial for the human species. Moreover, it requires the special form of communicative competence, talk, which only humans possess. It is also because humans can talk that they have managed to invent the coherent argument, the core of the special constraint that constitutes science, giving it a law-like character. Arguments are both competitive and cooperative at the same time, reputational work contains both elements. This strongly social element of science is missing in Latour's concept of the social. Latour reduces the social (both networking and agency) to naked competition. But the model for this thinking is not sociology, it is literature. As a social construction it possibly reflects the psychological effect of the French system of elite education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2017. Vol. 56, no 3, p. 454-476
Keywords [en]
social construction, knowledge constraints, transformative agency, intellectual fields, the nature, culture divide, construction sociale, contraintes de savoir, operation transformative, domaines intellectuels, opposition nature, culture
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-3408DOI: 10.1177/0539018417719429ISI: 000406602300007Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85026428316Local ID: 23661OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mau-3408DiVA, id: diva2:1400209
Available from: 2020-02-28 Created: 2020-02-28 Last updated: 2024-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kupferberg, Feiwel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kupferberg, Feiwel
By organisation
Department of Culture, Languages and Media (KSM)
In the same journal
Social Science Information
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf