Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2016 (English)In: Electroanalysis, ISSN 1040-0397, E-ISSN 1521-4109, Vol. 28, no 10, p. 2270-2287Article, review/survey (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
A review. Being inspired by a very recent review entitled: "Electrocatalysis and bioelectrocatalysis - Distinction without a difference" and following the general approach employed by Prof. Dr. Schuhmann, in the current work we point to the similarities and differences between oxygen electroredn. and bioelectroredn. processes. To addnl. distinguish our paper from the recent review we touch on different bioelements, such as redox proteins and living cells, but we still keep a special emphasis on oxidoreductases, biocatalysts par excellence. Moreover, we also exclusively focus on oxygen electroredn. based on direct electron transfer reactions. On the one hand, we corroborate the previously made conclusion regarding intrinsically high activity of the active sites of biol. catalysts, esp. redox enzymes, which results in mass transfer and heterogeneous electron transfer limited currents from oxygen reducing bioelectrodes. On the other hand, we disagree with the statements regarding the exceptionality of precious metal catalysts, and the notion of a huge trade-off between high activity and stability of non-precious metal catalysts and bioelements. We show that the activity and stability of noble metal based cathodes is very far from perfect, esp. when these electrodes operate in complex electrolytes, such as physiol. fluids, e.g. human blood.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2016
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-16179 (URN)10.1002/elan.201600280 (DOI)000387886500003 ()2-s2.0-84981333058 (Scopus ID)21937 (Local ID)21937 (Archive number)21937 (OAI)
2020-03-302020-03-302024-06-17Bibliographically approved