Sexual violence within academia is a major concern, and increased attention is being given to bystander interventions to combat these behaviors. This scoping review aimed to investigate bystander intervention programs focused on the prevention of sexual violence in universities worldwide. Literature searches were conducted using ERC, ERIC, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubMed databases. The inclusion criteria were: university-based assessments of a bystander intervention program, and pretest–posttest designs. In total, 1,644 articles were identified, of which 68 were included in the final analysis. Most of the programs focused on students as the target population, and the bystander interventions covered different aspects such as creating new community norms for intervening, increasing a sense of responsibility for intervening, increasing the participants’ feelings of competence, and providing role models for positive bystander behavior. There was a clear trend to use a combination of interactive and educational didactic methods. The programs were mostly delivered in person on campuses. Their outcomes included changes in norms, knowledge, and behaviors. In more one-third of the selected articles, the programs and initiatives were assessed using a pretest–posttest design only, almost just as many had additional follow-up conducted within 3 months. Most intervention programs achieved their intended impacts relating to bystanders and sexual violence, at least in the short term. Thus, investments in these types of preventative initiatives by organizations other than academic institutions could be beneficial.

Workplace civility training has been highlighted as one important measure to prevent theoccurrence of workplace bullying and harassment (Walsh & Magley, 2018). Indeed,intervention studies with the aim to increase civility have shown beneficial effects in the formof increased civility, reduced incivility from supervisors, as well as enhanced work-relatedattitudes over time (Leiter et al., 2011; 2012). Given that low intensity mistreatment mayescalate into workplace bullying (Holm et al., 2022; Zapf & Gross, 2001), civility interventionscould play an important role in reducing the risk of workplace bullying. However, as Walshand Magley (2018) point out, little is known about which factors that influence theeffectiveness of civility training. Thus, more knowledge is needed about both attitudinal andcontextual factors that may influence the effectiveness of workplace civility interventions.Consequently, the present study aims to explore both individual and contextual factors thatmay influence the outcome of a civility intervention

This article focuses on teachers’ and principals’ experiences of aggressive emails in home–school collaborations with parents. Semi-structured interviews with 31 teachers and principals from primary, lower and upper secondary schools in Sweden were conducted. Three categories were identified in the material which illuminate the phenomenon of cyberaggression towards principals and teachers from parents: ‘aggressive emails as reactions to principals and teachers’ performances’, ‘aggressive emails as a way of imposing power’ and ‘aggressive emails as a source of anxiety, loss of joy, and decreased focus on core tasks’. The study concludes that cyberaggression in emails from parents is centred around the act of negotiating and that email communication opens up spaces for negotiation to take place. The study also concludes that email cyberaggression tends to be instrumental in character, intended to result in a specific outcome rather than to cause harm. However, cyberaggression influences professional practice and can create a vicious circle of administrative obligation.

Background: Workplace mistreatment continues to be a problem that negatively affectsindividuals across the globe. Workplace civility interventions have been suggested as onepossible countermeasure, with the possibility to reduce workplace incivility and promote aculture of civility and respect within workgroups (Osatuke et al., 2009; 2013). Such interventions have been found to be effective in facilitating both short and long-term change (Leiter et al., 2011; 2012). However, civility interventions have almost exclusively targeted healthcare professions such as nurses and hospital staff. Consequently, there is still a lack ofknowledge about how civility interventions are received in different contexts, and whether theyare effective, over both short and long-term, in occupational groups outside of hospitalsettings.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a civility intervention delivered tothree different organizations, in order to investigate whether the intervention was associatedwith reduced levels of workplace incivility, as well as increased levels of civility and norms forrespect over time.

Method: The study had a quasi-experimental wait-list control design, meaning that workplaceswere allocated to either an intervention group or a control group. Individuals in the interventiongroup participated in a series of monthly workshops over the course of six months focusing on workplace (in)civility and workplace culture. After the intervention group had completed theintervention, it was implemented in the control group. Questionnaires were administered priorto the intervention (time 1), after the intervention group had completed their participation (time2), and six months later, when the control group had also completed the intervention (time 3).The questionnaires measured workplace incivility, workplace civility, and norms for respect.Participants were employed in workplaces within two different municipal organizations, and oneconstruction company, in Sweden. One of the municipal organizations employed staff atdisability care homes (N = 51). The other municipal organization employed nurses,physical/occupational therapists, and case officers (N = 160). The construction companyemployed carpenters, supervisors, and site managers (N = 46).

Results: During the presentation, results from all three measurement waves will be presented,exploring whether the intervention is associated with change in workplace incivility, civility andnorms for respect over time. Trajectories for both the intervention group and the wait-list controlgroup will be investigated. Possible differences between organizations will also be analysed.

Conclusion: Although workplace interventions can be one way to address workplace incivilityand reduce workplace mistreatment, they can require consistent effort and maintenance to beeffective. The presentation will, on the basis of the results, discuss possible factors influencingthe efficacy of civility interventions.

Funding: The study was funded by AFA Insurance under Grant 210121.

This study explores the nature of work-related cyber mistreatment from guardians, pupils, and members of the public as experienced by educational workers. Thematic analysis of data collected by semi-structured interviews with 31 teachers and principals resulted in two overarching themes; directly addressed cyber mistreatment in email and unwanted negative exposure on social media. The data spans over different types of cyber mistreatment, ranging from cyber incivility to cyberaggression. Educational workers typically feel powerless when exposed to mistreatment, and require support to manage these complex, novel, and distressing situations.

Bystanders can affect workplace bullying by engaging in active or passive behaviours. However, there is a knowledge gapregarding how perceived work environment factors relate to bystander behaviour. The study aim was to investigate how job demands, and job resources are associated with bystander behaviour in workplace bullying. An online questionnaire wasdistributed to a sample of health care workers at two time points. Longitudinal data were obtained from 1144 respondents. Cross-lagged panel models were used to investigate associations between job demands, job resources, and bystander behaviours over time. The results showed that social support was positively related to active behaviours, whereas influence at work was negatively related to both active and passive behaviours. Perceived illegitimate tasks were negatively related to active and positively related to passive behaviours, whereas emotional demands had an unanticipated opposite pattern of relationships. The findings provide new information about how factors in the organisational and social work environment are associated with active and passive bystander behaviours in workplace bullying. Specifically, the results expand current understanding of workplace bullying by relating bystander behaviour to the organisational context.

BackgroundWorkplace bullying is widespread in the healthcare sector and the negative effects are well known. However, less attention has been paid to bystanders who witness bullying in the workplace. Bystanders can affect the bullying process by engaging in active, passive, or destructive behaviors. There is a need to study work-related and organizational consequences of witnessing bullying and bystander behaviors.ObjectiveThe aim was to explore how witnessed workplace bullying and bystander behaviors are associated with work-related and organizational consequences, such as perceived quality of care, work engagement, and turnover intentions, among healthcare workers over time.DesignLongitudinal design. An online questionnaire was administered twice over the course of six months.Setting(s)Employees in the healthcare sector in Sweden, such as physicians, nurses, and assistant nurses, responded to the questionnaire.Participants1144 participants provided longitudinal data.MethodsStructural equation modeling was used to explore the associations between witnessed bullying, bystander behavior, work-related and organizational factors over time.ResultsWitnessed workplace bullying (B = − 0.18, 95 % CI [− 0.23 to − 0.12]) and the bystander outsider role (B = − 0.24, 95 % CI [− 0.29 to − 0.19]) were statistically significantly related to a decrease in perceived quality of care. Work engagement was statistically significantly predicted by all three bystander roles over time; positively by the defender role (B = 0.11, 95 % CI [0.05–0.17]), and negatively by the outsider role (B = − 0.23, 95 % CI [− 0.29 to − 0.16]), and the assistant role (B = − 0.32, 95 % CI [− 0.41 to − 0.24]). The outsider role (B = 0.12, 95 % CI [0.02–0.22]), the assistant role (B = 0.17, 95 % CI [0.03–0.30]), and witnessed workplace bullying (B = 0.18, 95 % CI [0.08–0.29]), all positively predicted increased turnover intentions at a subsequent time point.ConclusionsIn addition to the direct negative impact workplace bullying has on those targeted by it, witnessing bullying and taking different bystander roles can have work-related and organizational consequences by influencing perceived care quality, employees' work engagement, and their intention to leave the organization.